Radial Magnets · Technical Resource

Magnets & Temperature

Heat is the number-one field failure mode for neodymium magnets — and the most misunderstood spec on the datasheet. Here's what the temperature numbers actually mean, the difference between losses you get back and losses you don't, and how to design magnets that survive hot (and cold) for the life of the product.

FOR: DESIGN ENGINEERS · MOTOR & SENSOR DEVELOPERS · RELIABILITY ENGINEERS
Contents
  1. The four temperature numbers
  2. Reversible losses: the everyday effect
  3. Irreversible & permanent losses
  4. The load-line effect: geometry sets the real limit
  5. Choosing a temperature class
  6. Cold behavior
  7. Thermal cycling & stabilization
  8. Hot-application design checklist
01

The four temperature numbers

NumberWhat it isTypical NdFeB value
Maximum operating temperatureThe class rating (80–230 °C by suffix) — valid only at a favorable permeance coefficient (section 04)80 °C (N) to 230 °C (AH)
Reversible temperature coefficient of Br (α)How much flux dips per degree while hot — fully recovered on cooling−0.11 to −0.13 %/°C
Reversible coefficient of Hcj (β)How fast demagnetization resistance falls with heat — the reason hot magnets are fragile−0.5 to −0.7 %/°C
Curie temperature (Tc)Where ferromagnetism ceases entirely310–340 °C

The number that surprises engineers is β: coercivity falls four to six times faster than flux. A magnet at 120 °C hasn't just lost ~11% of its field — it has lost roughly half its resistance to demagnetization. That's why "how hot" and "how hard is the magnet being pushed" must always be asked together.

02

Reversible losses: the everyday effect

Within its safe envelope, an NdFeB magnet's flux simply tracks temperature — down as it heats, fully back as it cools. Representative flux and force levels versus a 20 °C baseline (α = −0.12 %/°C; force scales as B², per the pull force guide):

TemperatureFlux (Br)Pull force
20 °C100%100%
60 °C~95%~91%
80 °C~93%~86%
100 °C~90%~82%
150 °C~84%~71%

Two design consequences: performance targets must be met at the hottest operating point, not on the bench; and precision devices (sensors, instruments) see this drift as signal error — which is why thermally stable applications reach for SmCo or alnico (coefficients 3–6× better; see the material comparison) or compensate electronically.

03

Irreversible & permanent losses

Push past the safe envelope and losses stop coming back on their own:

Diagnostic clue

Irreversible thermal loss is usually uneven — the hottest or least-protected regions of the magnet (thin edges, poles) lose first, so a pole scan shows a distorted pattern, not a uniform reduction. Measurement methods: How Magnets Are Tested.

04

The load-line effect: geometry sets the real limit

The rating on the grades chart is a material capability measured under favorable conditions. What your specific magnet tolerates depends on its permeance coefficient (Pc) — set by geometry and the magnetic circuit:

05

Choosing a temperature class

06

Cold behavior

07

Thermal cycling & stabilization

08

Hot-application design checklist

Thermal Design Checklist

  • Real thermal profile documented: continuous max, excursions, self-heating
  • Performance target evaluated at maximum temperature, not room temperature
  • Load-line / permeance check done for the actual geometry and circuit
  • Temperature class selected with margin; availability confirmed (grades chart)
  • Above ~180 °C: SmCo comparison run at operating temperature
  • Demagnetizing fields at temperature accounted for (motors, opposing magnets)
  • Coating temperature limit ≥ application (see coatings guide)
  • Adhesive rated above service temperature; CTE mismatch evaluated
  • Process excursions handled: reflow, cure, sterilization sequencing
  • Precision devices: thermal stabilization specified before calibration
  • Ferrite parts: cold-temperature demag check at minimum service temperature