Bare NdFeB starts corroding the day it's made — which makes the coating a genuine engineering component, not a finish. Here is every common coating compared, how to choose by environment, and how to verify you got what you specified.
Sintered NdFeB is a composite of Nd₂Fe₁₄B grains held together by a neodymium-rich boundary phase — and that boundary phase is highly reactive. Exposed to humidity, it oxidizes preferentially, and because it forms the network between grains, corrosion doesn't just discolor the surface: it travels along grain boundaries, liberating whole grains as powder. An uncoated magnet in a humid environment visibly degrades in weeks — surface bloom first, then flaking, then dimensional swelling that can crack surrounding assemblies.
Corrosion also destroys magnetic performance twice over: oxidized material is non-magnetic (permanent flux loss), and the swelling opens air gaps in the magnetic circuit. This is why coating failure appears in the demagnetization guide as a root cause — and why the coating deserves the same specification rigor as the grade.
Uncoated NdFeB is legitimate only inside hermetically sealed or fully potted assemblies, and for short-lived prototypes. SmCo and ferrite, by contrast, are inherently corrosion-resistant and routinely run bare — one of their genuine advantages in the material comparison.
| Coating | Typical thickness | Corrosion (rel.) | Max temp* | Appearance | Cost | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NiCuNi | 15–25 µm | Good | ~200 °C+ | Bright silver | Baseline | General purpose default |
| NiCuNi + Epoxy | 25–40 µm | Very good | ~150 °C | Black/gray | + | Automotive, outdoor, humid |
| Epoxy (direct) | 15–25 µm | Very good | ~150 °C | Black/gray | ≈ NiCuNi | Humidity + adhesive bonding |
| Zinc (Cr3+ passivated) | 8–15 µm | Fair | ~120 °C | Blue-gray | Lowest | Dry indoor, cost-driven |
| Parylene C | 5–20 µm | Excellent (pinhole-free) | ~120 °C cont. | Clear | High | Medical, chemical, tight tolerance |
| Gold (over NiCu) | 1–3 µm + base | Excellent | ~200 °C+ | Gold | High | Biocompatible, cosmetic, contacts |
| PTFE | ~20–50 µm | Very good | ~200 °C | White/colored | Moderate | Low-friction, washdown, non-stick |
| Rubber jacket | 0.5–1 mm+ | Sealed system | ~80–100 °C | Black | Assembly-level | Shear grip + surface protection (see assemblies) |
| Ni + Sn, Ni + Ag, others | varies | Good | varies | varies | + | Solderability, special interfaces |
*Coating temperature limits — the magnet grade sets its own limit (see the grades chart); the working limit is the lower of the two. Corrosion ratings are relative; environment-specific performance is specified in salt-spray or humidity-test hours (section 09).
The industry default is a three-layer electroplated system: nickel, then copper, then nickel again, typically 15–25 µm total. Each layer earns its place:
Properties worth knowing: nickel is slightly ferromagnetic (negligible effect at these thicknesses), hard enough to survive handling and repeated contact cycles, and stable well beyond any NdFeB grade's temperature limit. Its weaknesses: it is a barrier coating — scratches through to the substrate become corrosion initiation sites — and salt-spray endurance is modest compared with epoxy systems. Also note nickel is a common contact-allergen and a California Prop 65-listed substance, relevant for skin-contact consumer products (see the compliance guide).
If the part will be adhesive-bonded AND lives in humidity, direct epoxy or NiCuNi+epoxy solves both problems at once — the bonding-surface benefit is detailed in the bonding guide.
Zinc plating (8–15 µm, blue-gray) costs less than NiCuNi and — unlike nickel's barrier-only protection — corrodes sacrificially, protecting small scratches galvanically. Its limits: softer and shorter-lived than NiCuNi, duller cosmetics, and lower practical temperature. Right for dry indoor, cost-sensitive, high-volume applications; wrong for humidity or handling-intensive duty.
Zinc passivation historically used hexavalent chromium. Modern trivalent passivation is the RoHS-compliant standard, but this is precisely the exposure a RoHS certificate on a zinc-plated magnet exists to attest — get it in writing, per the compliance guide.
| Environment | First choice | Alternative |
|---|---|---|
| Dry indoor, general purpose | NiCuNi | Zinc (cost-driven) |
| Humid indoor / condensation | Epoxy or NiCuNi+epoxy | NiCuNi (short life expectations) |
| Outdoor / automotive underhood | NiCuNi + epoxy | Parylene (tight tolerance) |
| Marine / salt spray | NiCuNi + epoxy (spec salt-spray hours) | Sealed assembly, or switch to SmCo/ferrite |
| Medical / body contact | Parylene or gold | Ti or PTFE per device requirements |
| Chemical / solvent / sterilization | Parylene | PTFE; verify against the specific chemistry |
| Vacuum / space | NiCuNi (low outgassing) | Bare SmCo — plastics need outgassing qualification |
| Adhesive-bonded joint | Epoxy coating | Abraded NiCuNi (see bonding) |
| Hydrogen exposure | No coating fixes this — avoid NdFeB | SmCo or ferrite (materials) |
| Skin-contact consumer product | Epoxy, gold, or PTFE (nickel-allergy aware) | NiCuNi with Prop 65 review |
When the environment is severe enough that coating selection turns into coating engineering — repeated salt-spray failures, sterilization cycling, chemical cocktails — step back and re-run the material choice: bare SmCo or ferrite is sometimes the cheaper system answer than the fourth coating iteration on NdFeB.
The coating is one of the two surfaces in every bonded magnet joint, and the joint is only as strong as the coating's own adhesion to the NdFeB beneath. The short version of the bonding guide's coating logic: epoxy coatings bond best (like bonds to like), bright NiCuNi needs light abrasion to bond reliably, zinc's own softness becomes the limit, and parylene requires surface treatment. If a joint is structural, specify a coating-adhesion requirement (cross-hatch class or thermal-shock cycles) to the magnet supplier — a perfect glue bond to plating that peels is still a failed joint.