Custom magnets and magnetic assemblies, factory-direct. PPAP and ISO 9001 documentation available.
Start a Custom Order →10M+ magnets stocked on both coasts, fixed-rate pricing up to 1 year, credit terms and blanket orders.
Talk to Sales →Start with Magnets 101, work up to 201, then test yourself against the grade selector in the Knowledge Base.
Open the Knowledge Base →The 26 most-used guides are listed here. The full library runs to 68 guides and 29 tools, all filterable in one place.
Browse All Resources →Our free iOS app puts the full catalog and tools in your pocket.
Download on the App Store →True radial magnetization, ISO 9001, U.S. inventory on both coasts, same-day shipping by 2PM EST.
Why Radial Magnets →Enter any disc, block or ring geometry, pick a grade, and set an air gap. The calculator returns the estimated on-axis flux density at that gap — what a sensor or gaussmeter sees — and the estimated pull force against a thick mild-steel plate, in pounds, kilograms and newtons.
Two textbook results are combined, with no fudge factors:
| 1 — field at distance | The on-axis flux density of a uniformly magnetized cylinder or block has an exact closed-form solution (shown under formulas). Rings are computed as an outer cylinder minus an inner cylinder — superposition. |
| 2 — force from field | Contact with thick steel is modeled by the image method: the plate behaves like a mirror-image magnet, doubling the normal field at the interface. Maxwell stress then gives F = B²·A / 2µ₀ integrated over the pole face. |
| alnico — shape-dependent Br | NdFeB, SmCo and ferrite hold close to their catalog Br in almost any shape. Alnico does not: its coercivity is low, so a short or wide magnet works far down its demagnetization curve and delivers much less than catalog Br. For Alnico grades the calculator first finds the working point from the shape (permeance coefficient), then feeds that effective Br into the same field and force formulas. Grade curves use generic published values, so treat Alnico results as a guide and confirm with a sample — Alnico pull is also normally rated with a keeper or pole piece. |
| magnet-to-magnet | By the same image argument, the attraction between two identical magnets in contact approximately equals the single-magnet-to-steel value shown. |
| condition | typical effect on holding force |
|---|---|
| steel thinner than ~1/8″ under a strong magnet | plate saturates — force can drop 30–70% vs. thick plate |
| paint, powder coat or plating (each ~0.05–0.15 mm) | acts as an air gap — expect 5–30% loss per coated surface |
| rough or curved mating surface | effective gap at the interface — often 20–50% loss |
| shear (sliding) loading instead of direct pull | usable force ≈ pull × friction coefficient — often only 15–25% of rated pull |
| elevated temperature | force scales with B², so a 5% Br derate ≈ 10% force loss — see the temperature derating calculator |
| cylinder, on axis | Bz(z) = (Br/2) · [ (z+L)/√((z+L)² + R²) − z/√(z² + R²) ]z = gap from pole face, L = thickness, R = radius |
| rectangular block, on axis | Bz(z) = (Br/π) · [ tan−1( ab / (2z·√(4z² + a² + b²)) ) − tan−1( ab / (2(z+L)·√(4(z+L)² + a² + b²)) ) ]a, b = face dimensions, L = thickness |
| ring, on axis | Bz(z) = Bz,cyl(OD) − Bz,cyl(ID) |
| alnico working point | Pc ≈ 2.7 · Leff / Deq (B/Br)ⁿ + (H/Hc)ⁿ = 1, B = µ₀ · Pc · (−H)Leff = L·(1 + 1/(1 + g/L)) — doubles at steel contact, fades to L with gap; Deq = equal-pole-area diameter; n is fitted to the grade's BHmax. The resulting B becomes Br in the formulas above. |
| pull to thick steel | F = (2·Bz(g))² · A / (2µ₀) — image method + Maxwell stress over pole area A at gap g |