Magnets are brittle, plated with a low-energy metal surface, sensitive to heat, and constantly trying to pull themselves somewhere else. That combination breaks the standard fastening playbook. Here's what actually works — from adhesive chemistry to mechanical backup features.
| family | service temp | strengths | watchouts |
|---|---|---|---|
| two-part structural epoxy | −40 to 120 °C (std), 180 °C+ (high-temp) | highest strength, gap-filling, chemical resistance — the default for magnet bonding | fixture time 30 min–24 h; rigid grades crack under CTE mismatch — prefer toughened versions |
| heat-cure one-part epoxy | to 180 °C+ | production-friendly, very strong, long open time | cure temp vs. magnet grade — verify the oven won't demagnetize the part |
| toughened acrylic (mma) | −40 to 120 °C | fast fixture, bonds through light oils, excellent on metals, peel-tolerant | odor/flammability in production; exotherm on thick sections |
| cyanoacrylate (ca) | −40 to 80 °C | seconds to fixture — great for prototypes and small magnets | brittle, poor peel and shock, moisture-sensitive long-term. not for production structural joints |
| silicone / flexible | −60 to 200 °C | absorbs cte mismatch and vibration, wide temp range | low strength — use for potting/damping alongside mechanical retention, not as the primary joint |
| anaerobic retaining compound | to 150 °C | ideal for cylindrical magnet-in-bore joints with tight gaps | needs close-fitting joint (<0.25 mm gap) and active metal surfaces — primer required on plating |
Almost every "the adhesive failed" return we've helped diagnose was actually a preparation failure — the bond let go adhesively, leaving one surface clean. The plating survived; the interface never formed.
| # | verify |
|---|---|
| 01 | adhesive cure temp and service temp both below magnet's rated max at its actual permeance coefficient |
| 02 | bond stressed primarily in shear; peel/cleavage paths blocked by geometry |
| 03 | surface prep procedure written into the work instruction, with a re-contamination time limit |
| 04 | bondline thickness controlled by design, not by operator feel |
| 05 | lap-shear qualification data on the real material stack, tested at temperature extremes |
| 06 | mechanical backup feature present for safety-critical or high-vibration duty |
| 07 | assembly fixtures prevent magnet slam-together and control placement against magnetic pull |
| 08 | adhesive compatibility with magnet coating confirmed (no acidic attack on plating) |
We supply countersunk, chamfered, and custom-geometry magnets ready for your retention scheme — and we're happy to review your bonding approach before you cut tooling.
request a design review →